Skip to main content
MetroMinds
Platform
Solutions
Tools
Insights
Pricing
Book a demo Log in
Portfolio and prioritisation

Fund the initiatives you can defend, park the rest.

Put every AI use case on the same scale, record each decision with a status and a reason, and see which initiatives compete for the same work.

Four quadrants, four kinds of decision.

The matrix needs JavaScript. Open the use case explorer

Scale now

High business value and strong feasibility. The logical candidates to move forward.

Strategic bets

Strong value, but harder to realise. They often need data, integration or skills first.

Quick improvements

Feasible, with more limited value. Good for targeted improvement or bundling.

Park / rethink

Limited value and limited feasibility. Reassess before allocating capacity.

Across the Library, 43% of use cases are strategic bets and 33% are ready to scale.

From candidate to execution, with a reason at every step.

  1. 1. Candidate
  2. 2. Accepted
  3. 3. Approved for execution
  4. 4. In execution
  5. 5. On holdWritten reason required
  6. 6. RejectedWritten reason required

Use cases cannot be rejected or put on hold without a written reason, so a year later everyone can still see why a choice was made. Contributors submit, portfolio managers decide and customer admins manage access.

Contributors
Submit use cases and complete the business problem, owner and expected value.
Portfolio managers
Score, compare and decide, and record the reason for every decision.
Customer admins
Manage who has access to which portfolio.

Every status change is kept, so the portfolio shows not only what was decided but also when and why.

What each status means

See which use cases compete for the same work.

Six claims use cases in the Library each promise a share of the same claims handler's time. Added up, they claim 147.5% of it. MetroMinds shows overlap by business capability and suggests correction weights before the total reaches your CFO.

  • Use cases are grouped by the business capability and role they change
  • The strongest saving is counted once, the rest gets an overlap weight
  • The portfolio total stays something finance can check

Read how the correction works

Stacked bar chart: six claims use cases that each promise a share of the same claims handler's time add up to 147.5%, against a 100% line.
Source: MetroMinds Library, 4,980 use cases (August 2026). Benchmark ranges are based on real-world implementations.

Compare on more than value.

The portfolio heatmap shows business value, feasibility, risk, strategic fit and confidence for every accepted use case, so a high score on one dimension cannot hide a weak score on another.

Business value
What the use case is worth if it works.
Feasibility
How realistic it is to deliver with today's data and systems.
Risk
How much damage an error could do.
Strategic fit
How well it supports what the organisation wants to achieve.
Confidence
How sure you can be about the benefit and the inputs.
MetroMinds use case heatmap for the fictional Northstar Bank portfolio, comparing accepted use cases on business value, feasibility, risk, strategic fit and confidence with coloured scores from 1 to 5
Demo portfolio

Bring your own AI ideas into one portfolio.