
Your AI Business Cases Are Counting the Same Savings Twice
Nearly every AI use case promises time savings. When several target the same work, the totals stop adding up. Here is how to spot double counting and fix it.
Every MetroMinds business case starts from your volume and baseline, applies benchmark ranges based on real-world implementations and corrects for scope, adoption and confidence.
Because every business case follows the same structure, two proposals can finally be compared on their assumptions, not only on their totals.
Choose a type of work, enter your own numbers and see what the benchmark ranges mean for you. Your inputs stay in your browser unless you ask for the report.
Benefits from accepted use cases are added up with low and high estimates, and MetroMinds warns where two metrics count the same saved time. 13,500 of the 14,940 benchmark metrics in the Library carry an explicit double counting warning.

Follow one use case from business need to funding decision.

Nearly every AI use case promises time savings. When several target the same work, the totals stop adding up. Here is how to spot double counting and fix it.

Half of all AI benefits are priced as saved time. Library data shows why that time rarely reaches the cost line, and how CFOs can make sure it does.

The use cases with the highest value are often the hardest to deliver. Library data shows why the largest AI business case deserves the most scrutiny.